lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:13:57 -0800
From:   Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethp@...zon.com>
To:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
        Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen-netfront: Fix Rx stall during network stress and
 OOM


On 01/30/2017 09:06 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 11:47 AM, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
>
>>> 2. It tickles a latent bug during resume where the timer triggers
>>> before we re-connect. The trouble is that we now try to dereference
>>> queue->rx.sring which is NULL since we disconnect in
>>> netfront_resume(). (Curiously, I only observe it with 32-bit guests)
>> I think we may hit this bug after removing the timer as well. We call
>> RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY soon after, which also dereference
>> queue->rx.sring.
> If the timer is deleted in xennet_disconnect_backend() then why would
> anyone be pushing anything to the backend after that?
Sorry, I got the ordering wrong. Thanks for the clarification..

Thanks,
Vineeth


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ