linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:20:07 -0500
From:   Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc:     Zac Schroff <zachary.schroff@...adcom.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zac Schroff <zschroff@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl> wrote:
> On 2017-02-02 01:31, Zac Schroff wrote:
>>
>> How about BCMA_IOCTL_PRESERVE_ACROSS_INIT?
>
>
> I think wireless drivers may still set some these bits during init.
>
> I've a simpler idea: make it bgmac specific. Call it sth like
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_PRESERVE
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_RESERVED
> BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_DONT_TOUCH

Yes, I am listing out all of the fields in that register.  We can be
intelligent about what we mask off :)