linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:16:52 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>,
        Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller
 Driver

On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 21:03 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 08:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 19:45 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> > > On 02/08/2017 05:40 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 16:17 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> > > > > On 02/08/2017 02:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > 


>  Should I keep my inline {clr,set}_bit_in_byte() 
> functions an use BIT() in there, or delete them and use BIT()
> directly 
> in usb251xb_get_ofdata() ?

Does it make any sense?

Even just name of your function is longer than what it substitutes.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy