linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:07 -0600
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
CC:     <mugunthanvnm@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <AStarikovskiy@...con.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume



On 02/09/2017 07:45 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:54:24 +0200
>
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:21:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>>> Date: Thu,  9 Feb 2017 02:07:34 +0200
>>>
>>>> These two patches fix suspend/resume chain.
>>>
>>> Patch 2 doesn't apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please
>>> respin this series.
>>
>> Strange, I've just checked it on net-next/master, it was applied w/o any
>> warnings.
>
> It makes no sense to test "net-next" when I am telling you that it is
> the "net" tree it doesn't apply to.
>
> This is a bug fix, so it should be targetting the "net" tree.
>

Looks like the first fix is for net, but the second one is for net-next
I do not see
03fd01ad0eead23eb79294b6fb4d71dcac493855
"net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't duplicate ndev_running"
in net.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii