linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:15:43 +0000
From:   "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>
To:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
        "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update
 is disabled

It is better to revert the 63d0f0a6952a.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Jarkko Nikula [mailto:jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 4:19 PM
To: Suthikulpanit, Suravee <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>; mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com; andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com; Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update is disabled

On 10.02.2017 08:38, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> At this points, my understanding is there are probably two options here:
>
> 1) Keep the commit 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic 
> tar update
>    is possible) and apply V2 of this patch in 4.10. We might need to 
> back-port the change
>    to v4.9 stable as well.
>
> 2) Revert the 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar 
> update is possible) in 4.10,
>    and also in v4.9 stable as well.
>
I'm fine with both options. Maybe revert as commit 0317e6c0f1dc ("i2c: 
designware: do not disable adapter after transfer") was also reverted and this revert doesn't seem to cause conflicts.

--
Jarkko