linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging: bcm2835-audio: bcm2835.h: fix line length coding style issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:32:26 -0500
From:   Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Michael Zoran <mzoran@...wfest.net>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging: bcm2835-audio: bcm2835.h: fix line length
 coding style issue

Thanks, Joe.

Is this to say that scripts/checkpatch.pl should be updated to some
higher column limit?  I have made these cleanup changes before in a
like manner.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:16 -0500, Nathan Howard wrote:
>> Fix checkpatch.pl warning of the form "WARNING: line over 80 characters."
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835.h b/drivers/staging/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835.h
> []
>> @@ -163,8 +163,10 @@ int bcm2835_audio_write(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream,
>>                       unsigned int count,
>>                       void *src);
>>  void bcm2835_playback_fifo(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream);
>> -unsigned int bcm2835_audio_retrieve_buffers(struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream);
>> +unsigned int bcm2835_audio_retrieve_buffers(
>> +             struct bcm2835_alsa_stream *alsa_stream);
>
> This is not a good change.
>
> This line exceeds 80 columns only because
> it uses very long identifiers (30+ chars).
>
> Anything that uses these very long names
> is going to be silly looking when forced
> to use 80 column line length maximums.
>
> Basically, it's OK as it is and if you
> really want to change it for any reason
> the other style to use is to have the
> return value on a separate line like:
>
> unsigned int
> bcm2836_audio_retrieve_buffers(struct bcm2835_also_stream *alsa_stream);
>
> Even so, that's not a good change either.