lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:24:24 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, hpa@...or.com,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390: convert debug_info.ref_count from atomic_t to
 refcount_t

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:06:18PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/debug.h | 3 ++-
>  arch/s390/kernel/debug.c      | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

I can only see a pull request from Ingo a couple of hours ago for Peter's
refcount code. So the refcount code is not merged yet. It would have been
good if you would have waited until it is really merged to avoid confusion.

> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ debug_info_create(const char *name, int pages_per_area, int nr_areas,
>          debug_area_last = rc;
>          rc->next = NULL;
>  
> -	debug_info_get(rc);
> +	refcount_set(&rc->ref_count, 1);

This is not wrong, but I will remove this hunk before applying your patch,
since this doesn't look like an obvious correct change at first glance.

Thanks,
Heiko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ