lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:50:16 -0800
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
        Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once
 nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:11:14PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Cases to bail out to avoid rendezvous process timeout:
> +	 * 1)If this CPU is offline.
> +	 * 2)If crashing_cpu was set, e.g. entering kdump,
> +	 *   we need to skip cpus remaining in 1st kernel.
> +	 */
> +	if (cpu_is_offline(cpu) ||
> +	    (crashing_cpu != -1 && crashing_cpu != cpu)) {
>  		u64 mcgstatus;
>  
>  		mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);


I think we should document the remaining race conditions. I don't
think there is any good way to eliminate them, and they are already
pretty small windows.

I think the sequence of events looks like:

     1	Panic occurs
     2	nmi_shootdown_cpus() sets crashing_cpu
     3	send NMI to everyone else
     4	wait up to a second for other CPUs to take NMI
     5	go to kexec code
     6	start new kernel
     7	new kernel establishes #MC handler

If one of the other cpus triggers a machine check while
getting to, or in, the NMI handler ... then that cpu will
skip processing (if RIPV is set).

Between '2' and '5' if crashing_cpu gets a machine check it
will execute in the old kernel handler, and do the right thing.

There's a fuzzy area between '6' and '7' where a machine check
might not end up in the right code.

>From '7' onwards the kexec kernel will handle and machine
checks caused by kdump.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ