lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:11:46 +0100
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        info@...romedabox.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] sound: soc: pxa: Suppress SND_MMP_SOC for arm64

Am 22.02.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:29:24AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> 
> This is patch 4 of 8, what's going on with dependencies here?

No dependencies on previous patches. 5/8 adds ARCH_MMP to arm64.

It compiled without this (just Kconfig warnings), so this could go
through the appropriate sound tree as a cleanup.

> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.

Should I make it "ASoC: pxa: ..." then? SND_MMP_SOC selects SND_ARM,
which in sound/arm/Kconfig says 'Drivers that are implemented on ASoC
can be found in "ALSA for SoC audio support" section.', which confused
me about whether or not this is an ASoC compliant driver if it selects a
non-ASoC symbol.

>>  config SND_MMP_SOC
>> -	bool "Soc Audio for Marvell MMP chips"
>> -	depends on ARCH_MMP
>> +	bool "SoC Audio for Marvell MMP chips"
>> +	depends on ARCH_MMP && ARM
> 
> There are no obvious build time architecture dependencies for this
> driver, shouldn't we have an || COMPILE_TEST in here?

I'm the wrong person to answer that - the symbol relies on
architecture-specific SND_ARM, and my understanding was that the code
still relies on platform data, therefore it did not seem worthwhile to
just disable inapplicable dependencies such as MMP_SRAM
(arch/arm/mach-mmp/; superseded by DT mmio-sram) or SND_ARM.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ