linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:52:15 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>,
        Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
        Stephen Bates <stephen.bates@...rosemi.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver

On 02/23/2017 01:36 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We're still waiting on any kind of response from Bjorn. (If you're
> listening please say something!)
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions for dealing with an unresponsive
> maintainer? Or a way for us to move forward with this quickly and get it
> merged?
> 
> ie. Can anyone else pick this up through another route? In the end, it's
> just a fairly basic driver and doesn't touch any core PCI functionality
> and we've had a fair amount of review from other kernel contributors,
> all of which we've addressed.

I'll add that we're already using this driver internally, would be
great to get it into mainline.

What is holding this up?

-- 
Jens Axboe