linux-kernel - camera subdevice support was Re: [PATCH 1/4] v4l2: device_register_subdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:53:22 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc:     sre@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com
Subject: camera subdevice support was Re: [PATCH 1/4] v4l2:
 device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times

Hi!

> > Ok, I got the camera sensor to work. No subdevices support, so I don't
> > have focus (etc) working, but that's a start. I also had to remove
> > video-bus-switch support; but I guess it will be easier to use
> > video-multiplexer patches... 
> > 
> > I'll have patches over weekend.
> 
> I briefly looked at what's there --- you do miss the video nodes for the
> non-sensor sub-devices, and they also don't show up in the media graph,
> right?

Yes.

> I guess they don't end up matching in the async list.

How should they get to the async list?

> I think we need to make the non-sensor sub-device support more generic;
> it's not just the OMAP 3 ISP that needs it. I think we need to document
> the property for the flash phandle as well; I can write one, or refresh
> an existing one that I believe already exists.
> 
> How about calling it either simply "flash" or "camera-flash"? Similarly
> for lens: "lens" or "camera-lens". I have a vague feeling the "camera-"
> prefix is somewhat redundant, so I'd just go for "flash" or "lens".

Actually, I'd go for "flash" and "focus-coil". There may be other
lens properties, such as zoom, mirror movement, lens identification,
...

> At the very least the property names must be generic (not hardware
> dependent) as this kind of functionality should be present in the
> framework rather than in individual drivers. That'll be for later
> though.

Agreed, that would be nice.

> Making the sub-device bus configuration a pointer should be in a separate
> patch. It makes sense since the entire configuration is not valid for all
> sub-devices attached to the ISP anymore. I think it originally was a
> separate patch, but they probably have been merged at some point. I can't
> find it right now anyway.

I believe I can find the patch. But I'm not sure if I can port it to
the fwnode infrastructure anytime soon...

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)