linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:41:30 +0100
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro

On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:26 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when
> > given an
> > expression instead of a simple value
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
> 
> Fixes tag? Is there a place in the code that is using a complex
> expression for val right now?
> 

Not if with what's already in, afaik. However "clk: meson: mpll: add rw
operation" I sent earlier today uses a ternary operator for val.
That's  how I found this issue. Instead of running the test, it would
always use the "else" clause.

I realize I should sent these patches in the same series.
Would you prefer me to do so ?

Jerome