linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 Mar 2017 22:26:02 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     mingo@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        yinghai@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, anderson@...hat.com,
        luto@...nel.org, thgarnie@...gle.com, kuleshovmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G
 unconditionally

Hi Ingo,

Ping!

Could you please help have a look at thie patchset and give comments or
any suggestion?

Checked the git history, you have been taking care of the
KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE value changing. Now Kees added his Reviewed-by, Boris 
agreed on setting the size of space for kernel mapping to 1G by default
but he doesn't like the adding KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE constant idea.

Your suggestion is much appreciated!

Thanks
Baoquan

On 02/02/17 at 08:54pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is v4 post.
> 
> In the previous 3 versions I tried to detect and determine kernel image
> mapping size at runtime for x86_64. With this the inconsistency between
> KASLR code is not compiled in by disabling CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and
> KASLR code is compiled in but add 'nokaslr' kernel option can be fixed.
> 
> When review v3 Boris suggested we should change kernel mapping size to
> 1G directly, but not an option. Kees explained he made kernel mapping
> size as an option mainly because he woried about kernel module space.
> He said it wasn't clear to him at the time if enough space remained for
> modules in all use-cases. Then Boris pointed out that practically kaslr
> will be enabled on the majority of the systems anyway, and the reduction
> of kernel modules mapping space has been there for a while now, if so we
> probably whould've heard complaints already. Kees agreed.
> 
> So in this version of post change kernel mapping size of x86 64 to 1G
> as Boris suggested. Then the inconsistency will naturally disappear.
> 
> And I still keep patch 1/3 which introduces the new constant
> KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE. And let KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE stay for restricting kernel
> image size during linking stage.
> 
> 
> v3->v4:
>     Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally as Boris suggested.
> 
> v2->v3:
>     Boris pointed out patch log is not good for reviewing and understanding.
>     So split the old patch 2/2 into 2 parts and rewrite the patch log,
>     patch 2/3 is introducing the new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE which
>     differs from the old KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE, patch 3/3 gets the kernel mapping
>     size at runtime.
> 
> v1->v2:
>     Kbuild test threw build warning because of code bug.
> 
> 
> Baoquan He (3):
>   x86: Introduce a new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE
>   x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally
>   x86/64/doc: Update the ranges of kernel text and modules mapping
> 
>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt         |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c        | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_32_types.h    |  6 ++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h    | 17 ++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/head64.c                |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S               | 12 +++++-------
>  arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c      |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c                   |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c                  |  6 +++---
>  10 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.5
>