linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:28:04 +0000
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
CC:     christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        lenb@...nel.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@...el.com,
        lv.zheng@...el.com, nkaje@...eaurora.org, zjzhang@...eaurora.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        eun.taik.lee@...sung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com,
        labbott@...hat.com, shijie.huang@....com, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
        paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, tn@...ihalf.com, fu.wei@...aro.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...ica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@....com, punit.agrawal@....com,
        astone@...hat.com, harba@...eaurora.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
        john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 10/10] arm/arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support

Hi Tyler,

On 28/02/17 19:43, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 2/24/2017 3:42 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 21/02/17 21:22, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
>>> handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
>>> SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> index b2d57fc..403277b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> @@ -602,6 +602,24 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   /*
>>> + * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
>>> + */
>>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
>>> +{
>>> +    if(IS_ENABLED(HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
>>> +        nmi_enter();
>>> +        ghes_notify_sea();
>>> +        nmi_exit();

>> This nmi stuff was needed for synchronous aborts that may have interrupted
>> APEI's interrupts-masked code. We want to avoid trying to take the same set of
>> locks, hence taking the in_nmi() path through APEI. Here we know we interrupted
>> a guest, so there is no risk that we have interrupted APEI on the host.
>> ghes_notify_sea() can safely take the normal path.

> Makes sense, I can remove the nmi_* calls here.

Just occurs to me: if we do this we need to add the rcu_read_lock() in
ghes_notify_sea() as its not protected by the rcu/nmi weirdness.


Thanks,

James