linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/15] drm/sun4i: tcon: multiply the vtotal when not in interlace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:54:50 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] drm/sun4i: tcon: multiply the vtotal when not in
 interlace

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:05:17PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > It appears that the total vertical resolution needs to be doubled when
> > we're not in interlaced. Make sure that is the case.
> 
> This is true for both channels, though we handle them differently.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > index e44217fb4f6f..515fa56c1e6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> > @@ -248,10 +248,13 @@ void sun4i_tcon1_mode_set(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon, struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> >                      SUN4I_TCON1_BASIC3_H_BACKPORCH(bp));
> >
> >         bp = mode->crtc_vtotal - mode->crtc_vsync_start;
> > +       val = mode->crtc_vtotal;
> > +       if (!(mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE))
> > +               val = val * 2;
> >         DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Setting vertical total %d, backporch %d\n",
> >                          mode->vtotal, bp);
> >         regmap_write(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON1_BASIC4_REG,
> > -                    SUN4I_TCON1_BASIC4_V_TOTAL(mode->vtotal) |
> > +                    SUN4I_TCON1_BASIC4_V_TOTAL(val) |
> 
> For channel 0, the SUN4I_TCON0_BASIC2_V_TOTAL macro multiplies the passed in
> value by 2. I think we should do the same for channel 1, and instead halve the
> value passed in if we are outputting interlaced data. I think this makes more
> sense because:
> 
> 1) The register description for both channels are the same. Handling them
>    consistently will result in less confusion, such as this one.
> 
> 2) The definition of interlaced modes is a frame is separated into odd and
>    even fields, with each field contains half the number of lines of the
>    full frame. One field is displayed during each VSYNC cycle. The TCON does
>    not know whether it's interlaced video or not. It only knows the display
>    timings. In this case, the number of horizontal lines per cycle is key.

Hmm, yes, you're right. I'll fix it in the next release.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)