linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] uapi: export all headers under uapi directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:34:18 +0100
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     arnd@...db.de, mmarek@...e.com
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, airlied@...ux.ie, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, bp@...en8.de, slash.tmp@...e.fr,
        daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
        msalter@...hat.com, jengelh@...i.de, hch@...radead.org,
        tklauser@...tanz.ch, mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, ldv@...linux.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] uapi: export all headers under uapi directories

Le 02/03/2017 à 17:56, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> Patches #1 and #2 are just cleanup: some exported headers were still under
> a non-uapi directory. Patch #3 is a fix to avoid exporting a file that was
> not under an uapi directory.
> After these three patches, all exported headers are under an uapi directory:
> path #4 stops searching files in non uapi directories.
> The patch #5 was spotted by code review: there is no in-tree user of this
> functionality.
> Patch #6 fixes some warnings/errors reported by 0-day tests.
> Patch #7 to #9 fix some errors when the corresponding files are included by
> userland.
> Patches #10 and #11 remove the need to list explicitly headers. Now all files
> under an uapi directory are exported.
> 
> This series has been tested with a 'make headers_install' on x86 and a
> 'make headers_install_all'. I've checked the result of both commands.
> 
> This patch is built against linus tree. If I must rebase it against the kbuild
> tree, just tell me.
> Michal, is this series going through your tree?
Still waiting to know who may take this series in its tree ;-)
kbuild tree has not been updated since two months (4.10-rc1) :/



Regards,
Nicolas