lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:47:53 +0100
From:   Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: use KERN_CONT in stack dump

On 12/03/2017 10:45, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 12.03.2017 um 10:38 schrieb Vegard Nossum:
>> Without KERN_CONT, the symbol will appear on a new line, making stack
>> traces completely unreadable:
[snip]
> I think it is better to fix the root of the problem by using a single printk.
> i.e.
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> index aa1b56f5ac68..18eddf677ec6 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> @@ -17,10 +17,8 @@
>
>  static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
>  {
> -       pr_info(" [<%08lx>]", address);
> -       pr_cont(" %s", reliable ? "" : "? ");
> -       print_symbol("%s", address);
> -       pr_cont("\n");
> +       pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pB\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
> +               (void *)address);
>  }

Your patch is better.

Tested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>

Thanks,


Vegard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ