linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb-gadget-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:43:37 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the
 usb-gadget-fixes tree

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:16:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   1f459262b0e1 ("usb: gadget: udc: remove pointer dereference after free")
> 
> from the usb-gadget-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   d293408ef303 ("usb: gadget: pch_udc: Replace PCI pool old API")
> 
> from the usb tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> index 8a365aad66fe,84dcbcd756f0..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> @@@ -1522,7 -1522,8 +1522,7 @@@ static void pch_udc_free_dma_chain(stru
>   		/* do not free first desc., will be done by free for request */
>   		td = phys_to_virt(addr);
>   		addr2 = (dma_addr_t)td->next;
> - 		pci_pool_free(dev->data_requests, td, addr);
> + 		dma_pool_free(dev->data_requests, td, addr);
>  -		td->next = 0x00;
>   		addr = addr2;
>   	}
>   	req->chain_len = 1;

Looks good to me, thanks!

greg k-h