lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:56:57 +0100
From:   Christian König <deathsimple@...afone.de>
To:     "Sagalovitch, Serguei" <Serguei.Sagalovitch@....com>,
        "Zhang, Jerry" <Jerry.Zhang@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc:     "Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
        Ayyappa Ch <ayyappa.ch.linux@...il.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "helgaas@...nel.org" <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: resize VRAM BAR for CPU access

> - Are we going to support resizing BAR when kernel
> modesetting  is not enabled and we are running in console
> under VBIOS control (VESA/VGA)?
No, initial I've tried to resize the PCI BAR during probing without the 
help of the driver at all. But the VESA/EFI/VBIOS don't seem to be able 
to handle addresses above 4GB for some reason.

So the approach is to let the driver kick the VESA/EFI drivers out and 
then resize when we know that nobody is accessing the BAR.

That's the only approach I've found without either blacklisting VESA/EFI 
drivers or crashing the system during the resize.

> - Should we restore PCI configuration if amdgpu
> will be unloaded?
Yeah, thought about the as well. I'm just not sure how to do it.

There is a lot of stuff we need to save and reset when the driver 
unloads for not much gain.

> - In function amdgpu_resize_bar0():
>    If resizing for "max" size failed should we try other
> sizes? What do you think?
Probably not worth it. If we get the BAR moved to a 64bit address we 
should have enough address space in almost all cases, so setting it to 
the maximum should succeed.

But I think we could add another parameter to allow limiting the resized 
size for all corner cases and for testing.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 23.03.2017 um 15:30 schrieb Sagalovitch, Serguei:
> Christian,
>
> - Are we going to support resizing BAR when kernel
> modesetting  is not enabled and we are running in console
> under VBIOS control (VESA/VGA)?
>
> - Should we restore PCI configuration if amdgpu
> will be unloaded?
>
> - In function amdgpu_resize_bar0():
>    If resizing for "max" size failed should we try other
> sizes? What do you think?
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Serguei Sagalovitch
>
>
> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Zhang, Jerry <Jerry.Zhang@....com>
> Sent: March 15, 2017 10:41 PM
> To: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Zhou, David(ChunMing); Ayyappa Ch; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; Christian König; helgaas@...nel.org; amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: resize VRAM BAR for CPU access
>      
> Thanks for your info.
> I see.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry (Junwei Zhang)
>
> Linux Base Graphics
> SRDC Software Development
> _____________________________________
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeucher@...il.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:25
>> To: Zhang, Jerry
>> Cc: Christian König; Zhou, David(ChunMing); Ayyappa Ch; linux-
>> pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dri-
>> devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
>> helgaas@...nel.org; amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: resize VRAM BAR for CPU access
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Zhang, Jerry <Jerry.Zhang@....com> wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Christian K?nig
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 17:29
>>>> To: Zhou, David(ChunMing); Ayyappa Ch
>>>> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; amd-
>>>> gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
>>>> helgaas@...nel.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: resize VRAM BAR for CPU access
>>>>
>>>> Yes, exactly that.
>>> (I'm not familiar with PCI too much.)
>>> Is there any restrict for PCI device?
>>> I'm concerning if any PCI couldn't support it on some motherboard.
>> It depends on the PCI root bridge.  This patch set only implements support for
>> AMD root bridges.  Intel and other vendors would need similar code.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>> Am 15.03.2017 um 09:25 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
>>>>> Does that means we don't need invisible vram later?
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org] On
>>>>> Behalf Of Christian K?nig
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:38 PM
>>>>> To: Ayyappa Ch <ayyappa.ch.linux@...il.com>
>>>>> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>> helgaas@...nel.org; dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: resize VRAM BAR for CPU access
>>>>>
>>>>> Carizzo is an APU and resizing BARs isn't needed nor supported there.
>>>>> The CPU can access the full stolen VRAM directly on that hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I know ASICs with support for this are Tonga, Fiji and all Polaris
>> variants.
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 15.03.2017 um 08:23 schrieb Ayyappa Ch:
>>>>>> Is it possible on Carrizo asics? Or only supports on newer asics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Christian König
>>>>>> <deathsimple@...afone.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try to resize BAR0 to let CPU access all of VRAM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h        |  1 +
>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 29
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c      |  8 +++++---
>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c      |  8 +++++---
>>>>>>>      4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>>>> index 3b81ded..905ded9 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>>>> @@ -1719,6 +1719,7 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_ttm_tt_pte_flags(struct
>>>> amdgpu_device *adev, struct ttm_tt *ttm,
>>>>>>>                                      struct ttm_mem_reg *mem);
>>>>>>>      void amdgpu_vram_location(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct
>>>> amdgpu_mc *mc, u64 base);
>>>>>>>      void amdgpu_gtt_location(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_mc *mc);
>>>>>>> +void amdgpu_resize_bar0(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>>>>>      void amdgpu_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>>>> *adev,
>>>> u64 size);
>>>>>>>      int amdgpu_ttm_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>>>>>      void amdgpu_ttm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev); diff --git
>>>>>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>>>> index 118f4e6..92955fe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>>>> @@ -692,6 +692,35 @@ void amdgpu_gtt_location(struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_device
>>>> *adev, struct amdgpu_mc *mc)
>>>>>>>                             mc->gtt_size >> 20, mc->gtt_start, mc->gtt_end);
>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>> + * amdgpu_resize_bar0 - try to resize BAR0
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>> + * Try to resize BAR0 to make all VRAM CPU accessible.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> +void amdgpu_resize_bar0(struct amdgpu_device *adev) {
>>>>>>> +       u32 size = max(ilog2(adev->mc.real_vram_size - 1) + 1, 20) - 20;
>>>>>>> +       int r;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       r = pci_resize_resource(adev->pdev, 0, size);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       if (r == -ENOTSUPP) {
>>>>>>> +               /* The hardware don't support the extension. */
>>>>>>> +               return;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       } else if (r == -ENOSPC) {
>>>>>>> +               DRM_INFO("Not enoigh PCI address space for a large BAR.");
>>>>>>> +       } else if (r) {
>>>>>>> +               DRM_ERROR("Problem resizing BAR0 (%d).", r);
>>>>>>> +       }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       /* Reinit the doorbell mapping, it is most likely moved as well */
>>>>>>> +       amdgpu_doorbell_fini(adev);
>>>>>>> +       BUG_ON(amdgpu_doorbell_init(adev));
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>      /*
>>>>>>>       * GPU helpers function.
>>>>>>>       */
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>>>>>>> index dc9b6d6..36a7aa5 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v7_0.c
>>>>>>> @@ -367,13 +367,15 @@ static int gmc_v7_0_mc_init(struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_device
>>>> *adev)
>>>>>>>                     break;
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.vram_width = numchan * chansize;
>>>>>>> -       /* Could aper size report 0 ? */
>>>>>>> -       adev->mc.aper_base = pci_resource_start(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> -       adev->mc.aper_size = pci_resource_len(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>>             /* size in MB on si */
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.mc_vram_size = RREG32(mmCONFIG_MEMSIZE) *
>>>>>>> 1024ULL *
>>>> 1024ULL;
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.real_vram_size = RREG32(mmCONFIG_MEMSIZE) *
>>>>>>> 1024ULL
>>>>>>> * 1024ULL;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +       if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU))
>>>>>>> +               amdgpu_resize_bar0(adev);
>>>>>>> +       adev->mc.aper_base = pci_resource_start(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> +       adev->mc.aper_size = pci_resource_len(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>      #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>>>>>>             if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) {
>>>>>>>                     adev->mc.aper_base =
>>>>>>> ((u64)RREG32(mmMC_VM_FB_OFFSET)) << 22; diff --git
>>>>>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>>>>>>> index c087b00..7761ad3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
>>>>>>> @@ -459,13 +459,15 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_mc_init(struct
>>>>>>> amdgpu_device
>>>> *adev)
>>>>>>>                     break;
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.vram_width = numchan * chansize;
>>>>>>> -       /* Could aper size report 0 ? */
>>>>>>> -       adev->mc.aper_base = pci_resource_start(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> -       adev->mc.aper_size = pci_resource_len(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>>             /* size in MB on si */
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.mc_vram_size = RREG32(mmCONFIG_MEMSIZE) *
>>>>>>> 1024ULL *
>>>> 1024ULL;
>>>>>>>             adev->mc.real_vram_size = RREG32(mmCONFIG_MEMSIZE) *
>>>>>>> 1024ULL
>>>>>>> * 1024ULL;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +       if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU))
>>>>>>> +               amdgpu_resize_bar0(adev);
>>>>>>> +       adev->mc.aper_base = pci_resource_start(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> +       adev->mc.aper_size = pci_resource_len(adev->pdev, 0);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>      #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>>>>>>             if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) {
>>>>>>>                     adev->mc.aper_base =
>>>>>>> ((u64)RREG32(mmMC_VM_FB_OFFSET)) << 22;
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>>> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>      


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ