linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 17/30] kernek/fork.c: allocate idle task for a CPU always on its local node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:58:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 17/30] kernek/fork.c: allocate idle task for a CPU always on its local node

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

commit 725fc629ff2545b061407305ae51016c9f928fce upstream.

Linux preallocates the task structs of the idle tasks for all possible
CPUs.  This currently means they all end up on node 0.  This also
implies that the cache line of MWAIT, which is around the flags field in
the task struct, are all located in node 0.

We see a noticeable performance improvement on Knights Landing CPUs when
the cache lines used for MWAIT are located in the local nodes of the
CPUs using them.  I would expect this to give a (likely slight)
improvement on other systems too.

The patch implements placing the idle task in the node of its CPUs, by
passing the right target node to copy_process()

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: use NUMA_NO_NODE, not a bare -1]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463492694-15833-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/fork.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -331,13 +331,14 @@ void set_task_stack_end_magic(struct tas
 	*stackend = STACK_END_MAGIC;	/* for overflow detection */
 }
 
-static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
+static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 	struct thread_info *ti;
-	int node = tsk_fork_get_node(orig);
 	int err;
 
+	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+		node = tsk_fork_get_node(orig);
 	tsk = alloc_task_struct_node(node);
 	if (!tsk)
 		return NULL;
@@ -1270,7 +1271,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 					int __user *child_tidptr,
 					struct pid *pid,
 					int trace,
-					unsigned long tls)
+					unsigned long tls,
+					int node)
 {
 	int retval;
 	struct task_struct *p;
@@ -1323,7 +1325,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 		goto fork_out;
 
 	retval = -ENOMEM;
-	p = dup_task_struct(current);
+	p = dup_task_struct(current, node);
 	if (!p)
 		goto fork_out;
 
@@ -1699,7 +1701,8 @@ static inline void init_idle_pids(struct
 struct task_struct *fork_idle(int cpu)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task;
-	task = copy_process(CLONE_VM, 0, 0, NULL, &init_struct_pid, 0, 0);
+	task = copy_process(CLONE_VM, 0, 0, NULL, &init_struct_pid, 0, 0,
+			    cpu_to_node(cpu));
 	if (!IS_ERR(task)) {
 		init_idle_pids(task->pids);
 		init_idle(task, cpu);
@@ -1744,7 +1747,7 @@ long _do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags,
 	}
 
 	p = copy_process(clone_flags, stack_start, stack_size,
-			 child_tidptr, NULL, trace, tls);
+			 child_tidptr, NULL, trace, tls, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	/*
 	 * Do this prior waking up the new thread - the thread pointer
 	 * might get invalid after that point, if the thread exits quickly.