linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: jack - check status of GPIO-based pins on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:22:09 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: jack - check status of GPIO-based pins on resume

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:51:47PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:50:43PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
> > 
> > For GPIO-backed pins that are not configured as wakeup sources, we may
> > miss change in their state that happens while system is suspended. Let's
> > use PM notifier to refresh their state upon resume.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
> > ---
> 
> Please send patches from the mail account corresponding to the signoff,
> not doing that makes the patch look like it's missing a signoff (as it's
> got the From line so more than one signoff is expected but there's only
> one) which slows down review.

Resent from @chromium.

-- 
Dmitry