linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trace: Make trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:35:13 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: Make trace_hwlat timestamp y2038 safe

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:53:09 +0200
>> We could probably introduce a %pts format string for timespec64
>> and have that pretty-printed.
>
> Hmm, probably don't want a %p as that suggests its a pointer, which it
> should not be. Unless we pass in the address of the number.

The special format strings that the kernel defines all start with %p and
require passing by reference so we don't get a warning from gcc. We can't
just make up new format strings otherwise, but we can create new meaning
for special pointers as we do for struct resource and others.

       Arnd