lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:31:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 63/76] PCI: Decouple IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE and PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>


From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ]

Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE.
PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if
we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use.
IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
 			mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
 		}
 	} else {
-		res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE);
+		if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+			res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE;
 		l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
 		sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
 		mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ