lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:35:28 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Apparent backward time travel in timestamps on file creation

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> The difference can be quite noticeable - basically the
> "gettimeofday()" time will interpolate within timer ticks, while
> "xtime" is just the truncated "time at timer tick" value _without_ the
> correction.

Is there any way to determine the error bar, do you know?  Or do I just make
up a fudge factor?

Obviously the filesystem truncation would need to be taken into account (and
this can be different for different timestamps within the same filesystem).

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ