linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH v3 1/3] mfd: intel_soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:43:35 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        kbuild-all@...org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH v3 1/3] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess
 with compilation units

On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 15:33 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 12:26:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 02 Apr 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:03 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...e
> > > > > > l.com>
> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > Yes, I understand how to fix this, though it's not a problem of
> > > > this
> > > > patch per se.
> > > > 
> > > > Fengguang, is there any possible way to determine the relation
> > > > between
> > > > an error and a root cause change?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Andy, our 0day build error reports are all bisected ones. It means
> > > the
> > > error happens since the reported patch/commit, which is either
> > > responsible for the root cause, or somehow triggers (or changes
> > > the
> > > exact form of) an old bug.
> > 
> > Thanks, like you said in this case it looks pretty much for
> > triggering
> > an old bug.
> 
> Quite.  But as a good open source citizen, you'll follow up with
> patches too, right? :)

It looks like I have to submit fix for older bug first. Likely I can do
this without delays and give you a green light to apply via your tree.
Unfortunately I will continue on this tomorrow.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy