[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:04:10 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcel Partap <mpartap@....net>,
Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: cpcap: Fix interrupt to use level interrupt
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:15:54PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I made a mistake assuming the device tree configuration for interrupt
> triggering was somehow passed to the SPI device but it's not.
>
> In the Motorola Linux kernel tree CPCAP PMIC is configured as a rising
> edge triggered interrupt, but then then it's interrupt handler keeps
> looping until the GPIO line goes down. So the CPCAP interrupt is clearly
> a level interrupt and not an edge interrupt.
>
> Earlier when I tried to configure it as level interrupt using the
> device tree, I did not account that the triggering only gets passed
> to the SPI core and it also needs to be specified in the CPCAP driver
> when we do devm_regmap_add_irq_chip().
>
> Fixes: 56e1d40d3bea ("mfd: cpcap: Add minimal support")
> Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: Marcel Partap <mpartap@....net>
> Cc: Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>
> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> ---
Thanks for looking into that further, I thought that might be
what was going on.
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists