[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:49:57 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan <sathyaosid@...il.com>,
David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: cleanup set/unset no_reboot calls
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Both iTCO_wdt_unset_NO_REBOOT_bit() and iTCO_wdt_unset_NO_REBOOT_bit()
> functions has lot of common code between them. So merging these two
> functions would remove these unnecessary code duplications. This patch
> fixes this issue by creating single update function to handle both
> set/unset functionalities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Something similar should go before patch 3/6.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists