[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 00:31:40 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Random guest crashes since 5c34d002dcc7 ("virtio_pci: use shared
interrupts for virtqueues")
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:38:35PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 21:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > And just making double sure, the 1st version that has the issue
> > is 5c34d002dcc7, isn't it? I'm asking because subject says so
> > but then goes on to list subject from another commit.
> > This one is:
> > > virtio_pci: remove struct virtio_pci_vq_info
>
> When the hibernation related warnings started I don't know, I wasn't
> targeting that, those fell out of subsequent testing.
> I started out
> hunting console breakage point w. threaded irqs, which is 5c34d002dcc7.
OK but 5c34d002dcc7 isn't "virtio_pci: use shared
interrupts for virtqueues".
>
> -Mike
I'm confused at this point. I would appreciate the summary of
which versions were tested and what did you see. Testing
a revert might also help.
Thanks a lot for your testing!
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists