lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:10:18 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net/ipv4: use-after-free in ipv4_mtu

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 15:33 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> Good find! I missed the refcnt in rt_set_nexthop() before that commit.
>>
>> We need to revert that commit to restore the refcnt for fib_info.
>
> Well, there are other spots , in decnet and IPv6.

IPv6 is very different, it copies or steals the metrics from mx6_config:

static int fib6_commit_metrics(struct dst_entry *dst, struct mx6_config *mxc)
{
        if (!mxc->mx)
                return 0;

        if (dst->flags & DST_HOST) {
                u32 *mp = dst_metrics_write_ptr(dst);

                if (unlikely(!mp))
                        return -ENOMEM;

                fib6_copy_metrics(mp, mxc);
        } else {
                dst_init_metrics(dst, mxc->mx, false);

                /* We've stolen mx now. */
                mxc->mx = NULL;
        }

        return 0;
}

so probably doesn't need a refcnt.

Decnet has already done the refcnt'ing, see dn_fib_semantic_match().


>
> This is why my original mail stated the problem was in the calls to :
>
> dst_init_metrics(&rt->dst, fi->fib_metrics, true);
>
> Lets do not think in "reverting" spirit, but adding the missing bits.
>
> The problem here is that the metrics should not be freed until last user
> is gone.
>
> So maybe a refcount should be added to metrics, and we do not have to
> add a fib pointer again in all dsts.
>

Good point, but it is harder than just revert given that fact that dst metrics
is a magic pointer to an array and COW.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ