linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: Add documentation for GP10B GPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 8 Apr 2017 19:20:08 +0900
From:   Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: Add documentation for GP10B GPU

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:26:44PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> GP10B's definition is mostly similar to GK20A's and GM20B's. The only
>> noticeable difference is the use of power domains instead of a regulator
>> for power supply.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - It's much better when it compiles.
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
>> index ff3db65e50de..b7e4c7444510 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties:
>>    Currently recognized values:
>>    - nvidia,gk20a
>>    - nvidia,gm20b
>> +  - nvidia,gp10b
>>  - reg: Physical base address and length of the controller's registers.
>>    Must contain two entries:
>>    - first entry for bar0
>> @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ Required properties:
>>  - interrupt-names: Must include the following entries:
>>    - stall
>>    - nonstall
>> -- vdd-supply: regulator for supply voltage.
>> +- vdd-supply: regulator for supply voltage. Only required for GPUs not using
>> +  power domains.
>>  - clocks: Must contain an entry for each entry in clock-names.
>>    See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details.
>>  - clock-names: Must include the following entries:
>> @@ -27,6 +29,8 @@ is also required:
>>    See ../reset/reset.txt for details.
>>  - reset-names: Must include the following entries:
>>    - gpu
>> +- power-domains: GPUs that make use of power domains can define this property
>> +  instead of vdd-supply. Currently "nvidia,gp10b" makes use of this.
>>
>>  Optional properties:
>>  - iommus: A reference to the IOMMU. See ../iommu/iommu.txt for details.
>> @@ -68,3 +72,22 @@ Example for GM20B:
>>               iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
>>               status = "disabled";
>>       };
>> +
>> +Example for GP10B:
>> +
>> +     gpu@...00000 {
>> +             compatible = "nvidia,gp10b";
>> +             reg = <0x0 0x17000000 0x0 0x1000000>,
>> +                   <0x0 0x18000000 0x0 0x1000000>;
>
> Would it make sense to add a reg-names property to give these meaning? I
> know that the binding describes what each entry is, but having the names
> specified in a property would make it more immediately obvious.

Would certainly work, especially since we have been doing this for
other properties. Is there an obvious pro to doing this though?