linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:43:20 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        xlpang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jdesfossez@...icios.com,
        bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL

On 2017-04-07 19:26:10 [-0700], Darren Hart wrote:
> I would like to see more testing because... well... futexes. But, we don't have
> a futex torture suite yet, but that is something I'm hoping to be looking into
> in the near future. What testing we do have available has passed between my
> futex selftests, the LTP suite, the pi_stress, and the RT runs by Sebastian.

It is also part of the latest v4.9-rt release which exposes it to
greater audience.

> Thanks,

Sebastian