linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 041/142] xfs: fix up xfs_swap_extent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:32:02 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 041/142] xfs: fix up xfs_swap_extent_forks inline extent handling

From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 4dfce57db6354603641132fac3c887614e3ebe81 upstream.

There have been several reports over the years of NULL pointer
dereferences in xfs_trans_log_inode during xfs_fsr processes,
when the process is doing an fput and tearing down extents
on the temporary inode, something like:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
PID: 29439  TASK: ffff880550584fa0  CPU: 6   COMMAND: "xfs_fsr"
    [exception RIP: xfs_trans_log_inode+0x10]
 #9 [ffff8800a57bbbe0] xfs_bunmapi at ffffffffa037398e [xfs]

As it turns out, this is because the i_itemp pointer, along
with the d_ops pointer, has been overwritten with zeros
when we tear down the extents during truncate.  When the in-core
inode fork on the temporary inode used by xfs_fsr was originally
set up during the extent swap, we mistakenly looked at di_nextents
to determine whether all extents fit inline, but this misses extents
generated by speculative preallocation; we should be using if_bytes
instead.

This mistake corrupts the in-memory inode, and code in
xfs_iext_remove_inline eventually gets bad inputs, causing
it to memmove and memset incorrect ranges; this became apparent
because the two values in ifp->if_u2.if_inline_ext[1] contained
what should have been in d_ops and i_itemp; they were memmoved due
to incorrect array indexing and then the original locations
were zeroed with memset, again due to an array overrun.

Fix this by properly using i_df.if_bytes to determine the number
of extents, not di_nextents.

Thanks to dchinner for looking at this with me and spotting the
root cause.

[nborisov: Backported to 3.12]

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 42cb2f3ea51f..51df0cf5ea62 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1776,6 +1776,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
 	xfs_trans_t	*tp;
 	xfs_bstat_t	*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
 	xfs_ifork_t	*tempifp, *ifp, *tifp;
+	xfs_extnum_t	nextents;
 	int		src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
 	int		error = 0;
 	int		aforkblks = 0;
@@ -1984,7 +1985,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
 		 * pointer.  Otherwise it's already NULL or
 		 * pointing to the extent.
 		 */
-		if (ip->i_d.di_nextents <= XFS_INLINE_EXTS) {
+		nextents = ip->i_df.if_bytes / (uint)sizeof(xfs_bmbt_rec_t);
+		if (nextents <= XFS_INLINE_EXTS) {
 			ifp->if_u1.if_extents =
 				ifp->if_u2.if_inline_ext;
 		}
@@ -2003,7 +2005,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
 		 * pointer.  Otherwise it's already NULL or
 		 * pointing to the extent.
 		 */
-		if (tip->i_d.di_nextents <= XFS_INLINE_EXTS) {
+		nextents = tip->i_df.if_bytes / (uint)sizeof(xfs_bmbt_rec_t);
+		if (nextents <= XFS_INLINE_EXTS) {
 			tifp->if_u1.if_extents =
 				tifp->if_u2.if_inline_ext;
 		}
-- 
2.12.2