linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: Add drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:16:08 +0900
From:   Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
To:     Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: Add drm_object lease infrastructure

On 03/04/17 01:31 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> writes:
> 
>> I'm also not sure whether we really want sub-leases in v1, that's easy
>> to add later on, but for now just complicates stuff. Main compositor
>> should be a full master, VR can be the first lease level, we don't
>> need more I think for now?
> 
> We've discussed how leases might be used to implement multi-user
> support, so offering sub-leases means that environment could also
> support leasing resources out from the users session.
> 
> We also just don't know how useful it might be until we explore the
> space a bit more.

It should only be added upstream once it's clear that it's useful.


> Given that it takes years to get new features into distributions, I
> tend to error on the side of generality.

Why would it take years? Distros seem to generally use the latest
upstream kernel release available at release/freeze.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (225 bytes)