linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:18:51 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.
> 
> Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
> Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
> would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
> ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
> with this going directly to arm-soc.

This may end up going via the PM tree.

> I think you need to update also:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt

Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some
DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that
fixed.

> With that change:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> (and implied acked-by)

Thanks.

-- 
viresh