linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf tool: protect empty evlists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:12:51 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Que <sque@...omium.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf tool: protect empty evlists

Em Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 01:14:31PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros escreveu:
> A common pattern in in pipe-mode bugs is accessing an empty evlist.
> Return NULL to make it easier to catch this problems.

This one is far reaching, we need to take care handling all places using
these functions, albeit probably most cases will always have an evsel, I
looked at builtin-top.c for instance, and I think we need to be more
careful here, will leave this for later.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> index 39942995f537..ba4788462325 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> @@ -257,11 +257,15 @@ void perf_evlist__splice_list_tail(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>  
>  static inline struct perf_evsel *perf_evlist__first(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>  {
> +	if (list_empty(&evlist->entries))
> +		return NULL;
>  	return list_entry(evlist->entries.next, struct perf_evsel, node);
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct perf_evsel *perf_evlist__last(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>  {
> +	if (list_empty(&evlist->entries))
> +		return NULL;
>  	return list_entry(evlist->entries.prev, struct perf_evsel, node);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.12.2.715.g7642488e1d-goog