lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:49:16 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sabitha George <sabitha.george@...il.com>,
        sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@...il.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: staging: ks7010: Adjust dev_err() calls in ks7010_sdio_probe()

> This patch does not apply to Greg's staging-testing branch.

Could the proposed changes be applied with a bit of “fuzz” for the
implementation of the function “ks7010_sdio_probe”?


> Markus a patch was merged the same day you submitted this one that
> refactored this code.

Do you refer to your contributions from 2017-04-10 here which seem to
touch only other functions?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/log/?h=staging-testing&qt=author&q=Tobin+C.+Harding


> The patch was good though, good spotting.

Will there any more approaches be needed for a corresponding
editing conflict resolution?
Which day would be better to dare a resend for my small update suggestion?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ