linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:49:27 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h
 header

Hi,

On Tuesday 11 April 2017 10:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:44 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>>>
>>>> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
>>>> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, this is confusing.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing you're sending this to Greg for inclusion into -stable?
>>
>> No, it's not for stable. It's for 4.12.
> 
> Then I'm totally confused, since this patch has already been applied,
> which is obvious since I already signed it off?

With your immutable branch applied to phy tree, it's going to be part of my
pull request too.
> 
>>> Isn't there a way to specify this intention?
>>
>> The pull request (cover letter) specifies this intention.
> 
> Great!  But you forgot to send it to me, doh!
> 
> Why are you sending patches with a pull-request?

Greg KH sometimes would like to take a look at the patches that are part of the
pull request. I've been practicing it for a long time.
> 
>>> Also, patch 1 and 3 appear to be identical.
>>>
>>> Not even sure how that's possible.
> 
> Still have no idea how you managed to do this!

I think first it got applied when I applied patches from local-next to next and
then I did a merge of your immutable branch.

Thanks
Kishon