linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: core: Allow orderly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 23:00:11 -0700
From:   Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:     Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc:     rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        nm@...com, t-kristo@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] thermal: core: Allow orderly_poweroff to be
 called only once

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:48:24AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> thermal_zone_device_check --> thermal_zone_device_update -->
> handle_thermal_trip --> handle_critical_trips --> orderly_poweroff
> 
> The above sequence happens every 250/500 mS based on the configuration.
> The orderly_poweroff function is getting called every 250/500 mS.
> With a full fledged file system it takes at least 5-10 Seconds to
> power off gracefully.
> 
> In that period due to the thermal_zone_device_check triggering
> periodically the thermal work queues bombard with
> orderly_poweroff calls multiple times eventually leading to
> failures in gracefully powering off the system.
> 
> Make sure that orderly_poweroff is called only once.
> 
> Reported-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3:
> 
>   * Changed the place where mutex was locked and unlocked.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 
>   * Added a global mutex to serialize poweroff code sequence.
> 
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 11f0675..9cad1ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_list_lock);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_governor_lock);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(poweroff_lock);
>  
>  static atomic_t in_suspend;
>  
> @@ -326,6 +327,7 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>  				  int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
>  {
>  	int trip_temp;
> +	static bool power_off_triggered;

I would prefer this to be closer to its lock. Can you please move this
to the global section?

>  
>  	tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp);
>  
> @@ -342,7 +344,12 @@ static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>  		dev_emerg(&tz->device,
>  			  "critical temperature reached(%d C),shutting down\n",
>  			  tz->temperature / 1000);
> -		orderly_poweroff(true);
> +		mutex_lock(&poweroff_lock);
> +		if (!power_off_triggered) {
> +			orderly_poweroff(true);
> +			power_off_triggered = true;
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&poweroff_lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1463,6 +1470,7 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
>  {
>  	int result;
>  
> +	mutex_init(&poweroff_lock);
>  	result = thermal_register_governors();
>  	if (result)
>  		goto error;
> @@ -1497,6 +1505,7 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
>  	ida_destroy(&thermal_cdev_ida);
>  	mutex_destroy(&thermal_list_lock);
>  	mutex_destroy(&thermal_governor_lock);
> +	mutex_destroy(&poweroff_lock);
>  	return result;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)