lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:15:18 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
Cc:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: bios with an offset are always gappy

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:35:17PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +		/*
> > +		 * don't merge if the 1st bio starts with non-zero
> > +		 * offset, otherwise it is quite difficult to respect
> > +		 * sg gap limit. We work hard to merge huge of small
> > +		 * bios in case of mkfs.
> 
> "huge of small bios in case" - -ENOPARSE.
> 
> "huge numbers of"?
> "huge or small"?

OK, it should be tons of or sort of description. As you can see
in the trace, there are 2560 bios merged in one request.

Thanks,
Ming

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ