[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:54:29 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] zram: fix operator precedence to get offset
On (04/17/17 10:21), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > However, it should be *fixed* to prevent confusion in future
or may be something like below? can save us some cycles.
remove this calculation
- offset = sector & (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
and pass 0 to zram_bvec_rw()
- err = zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, offset, is_write);
+ err = zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, 0, is_write);
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists