linux-kernel - Re: IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:55:07 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To:     "elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "leonro@...lanox.com" <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "yishaih@...lanox.com" <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        "sean.hefty@...el.com" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        "majd@...lanox.com" <majd@...lanox.com>,
        "hal.rosenstock@...il.com" <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "matanb@...lanox.com" <matanb@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 21:21 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't think this patch series falls in either category
> 
> I find that my update suggestion touches some aspects for the desired
> source code quality, doesn't it?

No.

Bart.