lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 23:31:38 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        david@...ma-star.at, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Correctly handle 0 value hashes in ubifs_lookup()

Use fname_name(&nm) == NULL to detect whether a double hash
lookup should be performed instead of checking for nm.hash
being non-zero. zero is a valid hash value.

Fixes: f4f61d2cc6d8 ("ubifs: Implement encrypted filenames")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
---
 fs/ubifs/dir.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index b777bddaa1dd..ff77a0aa2f2b 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static struct dentry *ubifs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 		goto out_fname;
 	}
 
-	if (nm.hash) {
+	if (fname_name(&nm) == NULL) {
 		ubifs_assert(fname_len(&nm) == 0);
-		ubifs_assert(fname_name(&nm) == NULL);
 		dent_key_init_hash(c, &key, dir->i_ino, nm.hash);
 		err = ubifs_tnc_lookup_dh(c, &key, dent, nm.minor_hash);
 	} else {
-- 
2.7.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ