lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:26:53 +0530
From:   Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...iumnetworks.com>,
        "Goutham, Sunil" <Sunil.Goutham@...ium.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Geetha <gakula@...ium.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase SMMU CMD queue poll timeout

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:29:36PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
>> From: Geetha <gakula@...ium.com>
>>
>> When large memory is being unmapped, huge no of tlb invalidation cmds are
>> submitted followed by a SYNC command. This sometimes hits CMD queue full and
>> poll on queue drain is being timedout throwing error message 'CMD_SYNC timeout'.
>>
>> Although there is no functional issue, error message confuses user. Hence increased
>> poll timeout to 500us
>
> Hmm, what are you doing to unmap that much? Is this VFIO teardown? Do you
> have 7c6d90e2bb1a ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Fix iova_to_phys for block
> entries") applied?

Yes it's VFIO teardown and again yes the above fix is applied.
But i didn't get how above fix is related.
TLB invalidation commands are submitted at 'arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync()'
and it's a loop over granule size.

1357         do {
1358                 arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &cmd);
1359                 cmd.tlbi.addr += granule;
1360         } while (size -= granule);

So if invalidation size is big then huge no of invalidation commands
will be submitted
irrespective of fix that you pointed above, right ?

Thanks,
Sunil.

>
> Will
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geetha <gakula@...ium.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index 591bb96..1dcd154 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
>>  #define PRIQ_1_ADDR_MASK             0xfffffffffffffUL
>>
>>  /* High-level queue structures */
>> -#define ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US     100
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US     500
>>
>>  #define MSI_IOVA_BASE                        0x8000000
>>  #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH                      0x100000
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ