linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC1x8s102

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:21:06 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc:     Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC1x8s102

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-04-25 09:31, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:

>> I think board-specific stuff should not go into the driver -> DT?
>
> Still looking for suggestions how to provide the external reference
> voltage as parameter. Chip select is gone now.

Unified Device Properties API.

Just
ret = device_property_read_u16();
if (ret)
 ...use default...

> Also, should I suggest a device tree binding even though I have no test
> case for it? My current feeling is to better leave this exercise to the
> first user on a DT platform.

But I prefer this one. One problem at a time.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko