linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: disallow building designware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:49:04 +0100
From:   Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: disallow building designware_pcm
 as a module

Hi,


On 21-04-2017 11:49, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:39:30PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Maybe rename to "dwc-i2s.c" and "dwc-pcm.c" (as the folder is
>>> called "dwc") and let the module still be called "designware-i2s"?
>> Lubomir's patch keeps the module name intact.  My point is that rename
>> of a file isn't nice to look at the git commit history, so it's better
>> to be avoided as much as possible.  But in this case, it looks
>> unavoidable.
> Right.  Renaming the source file is the lesser evil, it's possible
> people might have the module name in their configuration for their
> systems somewhere.

I agree. I just noticed today that without a valid license tag we
get unresolved symbols when inserting pcm module so this patch is
really needed as a fix.

Lubomir, could you address the review comments and resend? If you
are not available let me know and I will fix and resend the patch
with your sign-off.

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu