lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:11:14 +0800 From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: distinguish between inliners in the same function SNIP > ~~~~~ > $ perf report --stdio --inline --no-children > Failed to open [ext4], continuing without symbols > # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only > options. > # > # > # Total Lost Samples: 0 > # > # Samples: 499 of event 'cycles' > # Event count (approx.): 329354953 > # > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol > # ........ ......... ................. ................................ > # > 96.70% ex_random ex_random [.] main > | > ---main > __libc_start_main > _start > ... > ~~~~~ > > Note how no inlined frames are actually shown, because the first > sample in main points to an IP that does not correspond to any > inlined frames. perf report -g address --inline --stdio Did you try with "-g address" option? It's sorted by address. But anyway, I like this patch. It works well in my test. Thanks Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists