[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 13:05:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/sched/core v2] sched/rt: Simplify the IPI rt
balancing logic
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:03:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> My test case is two fold. It basically just involves running rteval.
>
> One is to run it on latest mainline to make sure it doesn't crash. The
> other is to backport it to the latest -rt patch, and see how well it
> helps with latency.
>
> To get rteval:
>
> $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rteval.git
> $ cd rteval
> $ git checkout origin/v2/master
Blergh, that thing wants a gazillion things installed.
Can't I run something simple like rt-migrate-test with some arguments to
stress the box out?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists