linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 21:24:50 +0800
From:   Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA_READY trigger

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:05:00AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:31:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > -int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
> >> > +int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
> >> >                        const char *name);
> >>
> >> I think I commented this once. Instead of increasing parameters,
> >> please introduce a new struct (as separate preparatory patch) which
> >> will hold current parameters. Let's call it
> >> strut adxl345_chip {
> >>  struct device *dev;
> >>  struct regmap *regmap;
> >>  const char *name;
> >> };
> >>
> >> I insisnt in this chage.
> >
> > I'm not sure if what you want is more simpler, is it something like what
> > this driver does?
> 
> Nope. The driver you were referring to does the same you did.
> 
> I'm proposing the above struct to be introduced along with changing
> prototype like:
> 
>  -int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
> const char *name);
>  +int adxl345_core_probe(struct adxl345_chip *chip);
> 
> In next patch adding interrupt would not touch prototypes at all!
> 

OK, got it. Thanks for clarifying.

> >
> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050.h#L41
> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/iio/gyro/mpu3050-i2c.c#L34
> 
> >> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >>
> >> Can we get rid of gnostic resource providers?
> >>
> >
> > I'm uninformed and still learning. Please let me know how to approach
> > this in some other way.
> 
> I suppose something like platform_get_irq(); to use.
> But it would be nice to you to investigate more.

I had a look and it seems I have to convert to platform_driver in order
to make use of that function. Is this correct?

Eva

> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html