linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] staging: sm750fb: unifying macro usage and definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 15:56:26 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Matej Dujava <mdujava@...urkovo.cz>
Cc:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] staging: sm750fb: unifying macro usage and
 definitions

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:20:18AM +0200, Matej Dujava wrote:
> This patch adds tabs into macro definitions so all rhs are on same column.
> Move MHz macro from ddk_chip.c to ddk_chip.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matej Dujava <mdujava@...urkovo.cz>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c    | 18 ++++----
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h    |  5 +-
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h | 78 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_hwi2c.c   |  4 +-
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h          |  6 +--
>  5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> index 944dd25..64d0a53 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
>  #include "ddk750_chip.h"
>  #include "ddk750_power.h"
>  
> -#define MHz(x) ((x) * 1000000)
> -
>  static logical_chip_type_t chip;
>  
>  logical_chip_type_t sm750_get_chip_type(void)
> @@ -36,7 +34,7 @@ static unsigned int get_mxclk_freq(void)
>  	unsigned int M, N, OD, POD;
>  
>  	if (sm750_get_chip_type() == SM750LE)
> -		return MHz(130);
> +		return MHZ(130);

But MHz makes more sense, don't you think so?

Please leave that as-is.

thanks,

greg k-h