lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 13:59:38 -0700
From:   "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option

On 05/19/17 13:53, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> Here's the struct in its current state:
> 
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_UNDEFINED		0
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_CFA			1
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_SP			2
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_FP			3
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_SP_INDIRECT		4
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_FP_INDIRECT		5
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_R10			6
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_DI			7
> 	#define UNDWARF_REG_DX			8
> 

Why only those registers?  Also, if you have the option I would really
suggest using the actual x86 register numbers (ax, ex, dx, bx, sp, bp,
si, di, r8-r15 in that order.)

	-hpa

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ